Supreme Court case that focuses on Criminal Law Research Paper

Supreme Court case that focuses on Criminal Law - Research Paper Example On October 31, 2001, the District Court reversed its’ decision and granted him the writ of habeas corpus, after determining that his reasoning for requesting it was that his sentence of death was unconstitutional. Martin Horn, Commissioner of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections argued that the â€Å"Supreme Court precedent did not require an outcome contrary to that reached by the state courts (536 U. S. ____ (2002). However, several other appellate and circuit courts found discrepancies in the way in which the case was handled and that it violated several Constitutional Amendments. One of the major points raised in attempts to repeal the death sentence was a case involving Teague v. Lane. The reason for stating Teague was to declare its purpose regarding the state’s ruling on criminal convictions depending upon the constitutional standards at the time of the actual proceedings. Amendments were made to the Teague ruling stating that these protectionist goals should be applied retroactively. The Supreme Court determined that "federal courts must address the Teague question when it is properly argued by the government." The Court then proposed the matter of Caspari v. Bohlen, that Teagues "nonretroactivity principle prevents a federal court from granting habeas corpus relief to a state prisoner based on a" new rule, and thus that "if the State ... argue[s] that the defendant seeks the benefit of a new rule of constitutional law, the court must apply Teague before considering the merits of the claim." The Supreme Court then decided that it was necessary for them to reconsider Banks’ sentence according to the Teague case and that the case of Mills v. Maryland was more important (Justia US Law 2003). The final determination however was that it was unnecessary to rule retroactively regardless of the circumstances that might have made it an arguable point. The Supreme Court ruled that

Please discuss the following question with philosophy ethics and Essay - 1

Please discuss the following question with philosophy ethics and knowledge - Essay Example A number of individuals have raised issues that utilitarianism is too demanding as a moral theory. Some respond by saying that it is not utilitarianism theory that places great demands on us, but rather the state of the world. Since the world is currently arranged in a such a way that many people are ill, hungry, or otherwise suffer greatly, this philosophical knowledge points out that we to do a lot. By doing a lot it means taking a number of actions towards alleviating the suffering. It is true and convincing that if everyone’s needs were largely looked after and most people were reasonably happy, utilitarianism would demand very little if anything from human beings. This is due to the fact that, if everyone’s demand were taken care of, then no one would end up striving to satisfy his/her need. It is in the process of utility maximization that different individuals end up messing up with others resulting into sorrow in the society. If everything is in control, then it means that there will be only one or two scenarios where an individual will have to come in for the purpose of achieving his/her utility. This will involve less actions or activities as compared to when there are a lot of illness, hunger and suffering among other calamities. Therefore in these few activities, utilitarianism will end up demanding very little from